Recently, Chris Pirillo posted

Why is it that people get all up in arms because someone finds that one system is better for them than the other?  This Ford vs. Chevy debate has been going on since the personal computer was invented.  Apple ][ versus Radio-Shack TRS-80, then Apple ][ versus Commodore 64, then Mac versus IBM PC and finally Windows versus Mac.  Interestingly, Apple always seems to be in the fight--formerly the volume leader, then the design-leader.  What is it about Apple that creates so much disdain for vanilla-computer users?  Those of you who just buy whatever the masses are buying, generally are ignorant to the difference between the mass-market system versus another.  Like a safe Camry versus a sporty BMW.  The industry is constantly changing, and although Windows enjoys millions of software titles, most of them are redundant and do not offer any advantage over a Mac title.  Conversely, if you require a specialized application, or you like to play games on your PC, then a Windows box may be your best choice.  

Pirillo has decided that Mac is the best choice for him and I would agree that for MOST PEOPLE, Mac is probably a better choice.  As a cross-platform user, I can surely tell you that all-in-all Windows is, for the hobbyist or specialized user, the better platform, but for most people Mac, with it’s “computer-out-of-the-way” environment and software/hardware control is much better for productivity and reliability.  Would you buy a microwave oven from one company with the software to operate it from another company?  Would benefit would that offer you other than price?  Would it cook your food fast, be more reliable?  Not likely and as computer users become more and more concerned with “what can you do for me?” rather than “how much can I tinker with you and optimize you” more and more people will decide on Mac.